The Cardinal, The Astronomer, and Darwin

From Scienticity

Revision as of 02:47, 28 October 2005 by JNShaumeyer (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search
The draft of this article is incomplete.

Contents

Events

7 July 2005

The New York Times revealed two days later that[1]

Schoenborn's essay had been written at the urging of Mark Ryland, vice president of the Discovery Institute, and submitted to the Times by the Discovery Institute's public relations firm.

The Discovery Institute is a principle proponent of "Intelligent Design" creationism.

2 October 2005

Notes

  1. ^ Cornelia Dean and Laurie Goodstein, "Cardinal: Evolution may conflict with Catholic beliefs", The San Diego Union-Tribune, 9 July 2005.
  2. ^ Bob Park, "Evolution: Shoenborn's Folly Linked to Discovery Institute", What's New, 15 July 2005.
  3. ^ "Cardinal backs evolution and 'intelligent design' ", Reuters, 4 October 2005.

Sources

Historic incidents of scientism and anti-scientism from the 21st century.

Personal tools
science time-capsules