Livio: The Golden Ratio
From Scienticity
JNShaumeyer (Talk | contribs) |
m |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| - | I did have one very small peeve: I would like to have seen more paragraphs that collected thoughts into shorter, more coherent units; I thought the author's paragraphs rambled | + | I did have one very small peeve: I would like to have seen more paragraphs that collected thoughts into shorter, more coherent units; I thought the author's paragraphs rambled somewhat. But I got past it easily enough and enjoyed the book. |
The author gets high marks from me for scienticity in this book, which I found very readable without sacrificing precision in its analysis. It's a very good example of rational, analytical thinking in action. | The author gets high marks from me for scienticity in this book, which I found very readable without sacrificing precision in its analysis. It's a very good example of rational, analytical thinking in action. | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
[[Category: Book Notes]] | [[Category: Book Notes]] | ||
| + | [[Category: JNS]] | ||
