Statements on Teaching Evolution
From Scienticity
JNShaumeyer (Talk | contribs) |
JNShaumeyer (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == Science Professionals == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === John H Marburger III === | ||
| + | |||
| + | John H. Marburger III is the Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (2001-- ) and current [[Presidential Science Advisors|science advisor]] to President Bush. In February 2005, shortly after the President made a statement supportive of teaching "Intelligent Design" creationist doctrine in public schools, Marburger responded publically to a question on the subject by saying{{ref|jhm}} | ||
| + | <blockquote> | ||
| + | Intelligent design is not a scientific theory. | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
== Professional Societies == | == Professional Societies == | ||
| Line 24: | Line 33: | ||
Intelligent design is not a scientific discipline and should not be taught as part of the K-12 science curriculum. Intelligent design has neither the substantial research base, nor the testable hypotheses as a scientific discipline. There are at least 70 resolutions from a broad array of scientific societies and institutions that are united on this matter. | Intelligent design is not a scientific discipline and should not be taught as part of the K-12 science curriculum. Intelligent design has neither the substantial research base, nor the testable hypotheses as a scientific discipline. There are at least 70 resolutions from a broad array of scientific societies and institutions that are united on this matter. | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Notes == | ||
| + | #{{note|jhm}}Quoted in: Daniel Smith, "Political Science", ''New York Times Magazine'', 4 September 2005. | ||
== Sources == | == Sources == | ||
Revision as of 20:46, 3 October 2005
Contents |
Science Professionals
John H Marburger III
John H. Marburger III is the Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (2001-- ) and current science advisor to President Bush. In February 2005, shortly after the President made a statement supportive of teaching "Intelligent Design" creationist doctrine in public schools, Marburger responded publically to a question on the subject by saying[1]
Intelligent design is not a scientific theory.
Professional Societies
American Astronomical Society
From the "AAS Statement on the Teaching of Evolution", 20 September 2005:
The American Astronomical Society supports teaching evolution in our nation’s K-12 science classes. Evolution is a valid scientific theory for the origin of species that has been repeatedly tested and verified through observation, formulation of testable statements to explain those observations, and controlled experiments or additional observations to find out whether these ideas are right or wrong. A scientific theory is not speculation or a guess -- scientific theories are unifying concepts that explain the physical universe. [...] Since “Intelligent Design” is not science, it does not belong in the science curriculum of the nation’s primary and secondary schools.
The AAS also made an earlier statement, by resolution on 10 January 1982, against the teaching of creationist doctrine (at that time known as "Creation Science"). For more information, see our entry on the American Astronomical Society.
ASA-CSSA-SSSA
From the press release "Scientific Societies Support Teaching Evolution":
In Support of Teaching Evolution
Position Statement by the Executive Committees of the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, adopted August 11, 2005
Intelligent design is not a scientific discipline and should not be taught as part of the K-12 science curriculum. Intelligent design has neither the substantial research base, nor the testable hypotheses as a scientific discipline. There are at least 70 resolutions from a broad array of scientific societies and institutions that are united on this matter.
Notes
- ^ Quoted in: Daniel Smith, "Political Science", New York Times Magazine, 4 September 2005.
